Well, there is not much to say. The letter says it all. Ignore the first part of it. That makes perfect sense and is in accordance with sanity.
Concentrate on Para No. 3.
Look at the dichotomy of the serious security need guideline in the preceding para and this succeeding para .
While there is nothing wrong with the intention of getting a ladies meet photographed by a lady, it is the suggestion of the use of a Lady officer for the same which is stupid.
Suggests a mentality of a particular kind.
In my view it means: "You may be an officer. But your being a lady changes it all".
But it's just my view. If you readers feel otherwise, do let me know.
Don't take offence where none is intended, simply as a troll. The basic idea of photography by a lady offr/ wife of JCO/OR is to avoid presence and involvement of men in ladies specific events. Lady officers are included in such events because they form an important link and lady wives of all ranks can identify with them as a woman and speak to them more openly. It is in no way degrading; as you are making it out to be.
ReplyDeletePick a worthwhile cause to espouse please; there are many.
stop being hippocratic. start seeing things that are unjust and offensive.
DeleteSaab ka hukum jo hai
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with you sir. Its demeaning to write such letters and involve in such acrivities. Why shud one photograph such events. Where is it gonna be published. And why shud it requite publicity.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the problem in suggesting that lady's functions be covered by a lady with a photographic interest.
ReplyDeleteAre you jealous that men are being discouraged? Please return the 2 minutes of my life I wasted on this trash
ReplyDelete